Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The design and operation of tidal stream energy farms will require the accurate prediction of tidal currents from field data. In the present paper we compare the performance of a physics based flow model, the traditional harmonic analysis method, and a newly developed code RTide. RTide is based on the Response Method proposed by Munk and Cartwright in the 1960s and uses machine learning to overcome the key disadvantages of their original approach. We use field data from the Meygen site in the Inner Sound of the Pentland Firth. We find RTide predictions based solely on the field data outperform both the flow model predictions and the currents predicted by harmonic analysis. Interestingly, feeding the physics-based flow model into RTide as an additional input does not outperform the predictions based on the field data alone. However, RTide can still be used as a correction tool to physics-based flow models.

Type

Conference paper

Publication Date

13/05/2025

Keywords

tidal prediction, response method, tidal stream resource