Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In an era of democratisation, transparency and accountability, the IMF and World Bank are under continuous pressure further to apply democratic principles to their own governance. Democratising the institutions does not mean introducing global peoples' elections for seats on their Boards, nor does it mean opening up all their processes and decisions to all-comers. The IMF and World Bank are representative organisations with constitutional limits on their activities and decision-making. The governments that run them need to update the rules so as to bring the institutions closer into line with public expectations that they be effective, accountable, appropriately representative, and fair.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/1468-0041.00246

Type

Journal article

Journal

New Economy

Publication Date

01/01/2002

Volume

9

Pages

77 - 81