Colchicine resistant friend cells: Application to the study of actinomycin D induced erythroid differentiation
Crichley V., Mager D., Bernstein A.
AbstractColchicine resistant (CchR) mutants have been isolated from Friend erythroeleukemic cells by successive single‐step selections. Measurements of the rate of uptake of [3H]‐colchicine into whole cells, and the binding of [3H]‐colchicine to cytoplasmic extracts, suggest that these mutants are colchicine‐resistant due to a reduced membrane permeability to colchicine, rather than an altered intracellular colchicine‐binding target. Consistent with this conclusion is the observation that non‐toxic concentrations of Tween–80, a non‐ionic detergent, potentiated colchicine uptake into mutant cells. In addition, these Friend cell mutants, like CchR mutants of other cell types, are cross‐resistant to a variety of unrelated drugs, including daunomycin, puromycin, emetine, and actinomycin D.A comparison of the dose‐response curves for the induction of Friend cell differentiation by actinomycin D of both wild‐type and two CchR cells suggests that actinomycin D permeation is required for its effects on Friend cell differentiation. Potentiation of actinomycin D uptake by Tween–80 significantly lowered the concentration of drug required to induce hemoglobin synthesis in the CchR cells, but had no significant effect on either actinomycin D induction of CchS cells or DMSO induction of both CchS and CchR cells. In common with other chemical inducers of Friend cell differentiation, the addition of actinomycin D results in an early decrease in 86 RbCl uptake, although this effect on transport occurred 14 hours later than that observed with DMSO.