International Consensus on Global Surgery Learning Objectives and Competencies
Abeza MA., Agarwal J., Alayande BT., Alonso N., Amson HJ., Assadi R., Augustin S., Awedew AF., Ayana BA., Baldan M., Banda M., Benjamin D., Bitew AA., Cherian MN., Chigwede M., Contini S., Courthaudon E., Crawford AM., Cunningham C., Dauphin A., Deng MDA., Dsouza RJ., Edgcombe H., Emil S., Fabiano S., Falk R., Fofanah T., Junior MAFR., Francius AE., Gashaw ZM., Gemechu N., Giannou C., Hewitt-Smith A., Kanmounye US., Kumwenda W., Lakhoo K., Ferreira JL., Mahmoodi M., Maoate K., Mcleod E., Meara JG., Millien C., Muhorakeye F., Baleka AM., Nataraja RM., Ndayishiimye T., Mukundwa PN., Nyiramahirwe A., Okelo S., Pathak M., Petroze RT., Poenaru D., Roesch M., Sonenthal P., Teklemariam TL., Temesgen WB., Vasco M., Virk R., Watters DA., Wetzig NR., Zuze B., Hilzenrat RA., Livergant R., Binda CJ., Adams J., Joos E., Joharifard S., Chin E., Haji F.
Objective: This project aimed to achieve international consensus on core learning objectives for global surgery education. Background: As global surgery emerges as an academic field, there is a growing need for consensus-driven learning objectives to guide education and training. Existing curricula vary widely and lack multidisciplinary input. Methods: A modified Delphi consensus was conducted with an international panel of global surgery experts. A scoping review informed an initial list of learning objectives, categorized into 14 domains based on the Consortium of Universities for Global Health framework. Panelists rated objectives over three iterative survey rounds, with consensus defined as ≥80% agreement within ±1 Likert point of the median. Results: Sixty-one experts from 26 countries across all World Health Organization (WHO) regions participated, representing surgery (40.1%), anesthesia (14.8%), obstetrics and gynecology (14.8%), general practitioners with and without enhanced surgical skills (16.4%), and allied health fields (6.6%). The majority (57.4%) had over 10 years of experience in global surgery. Across three Delphi rounds, 120 learning objectives reached consensus, covering key domains such as the global burden of surgical disease, surgical system strengthening, ethics and equity, health policy, and sustainable development. A total of 25 (20.8%) objectives were designated for introductory learners, 55 (45.8%) for advanced learners, and 40 (33.3%) for both levels. Conclusion: This Delphi consensus provides a structured, globally relevant framework for global surgery education, supporting curriculum development and competency-based training. These findings underscore the importance of aligning global surgery education with evolving healthcare priorities while ensuring adaptability across diverse surgical contexts.