Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in early respiratory support for infants born at <30 weeks' gestational age (GA) in England and Wales. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from the National Neonatal Research Database of all infants born at <30 weeks GA, admitted to neonatal units in England and Wales from 2016 to 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Methods of respiratory support used in the delivery room and days 1 and 7 of care were determined. Success of the initial non-invasive respiratory support strategy was assessed by any use of mechanical ventilation in the first 7 days of care. RESULTS: 24 107 babies were included. Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as the highest method of respiratory support for stabilisation increased during the study period (CPAP: 17.3% to 28.8%; HFNC: 0% (first recorded in 2016) to 0.7%). CPAP use increased in the most preterm (<25 weeks GA; 0.7% to 4.8%), the extremely preterm (<28 weeks GA; 7.2% to 17.5%) and the very preterm (28-29 weeks GA; 29.3% to 44.1%) cohorts. Among those initially stabilised with non-invasive ventilation in this study, 2763 (48.0%) infants required mechanical ventilation in the first week. CONCLUSIONS: In England and Wales, use of non-invasive respiratory support for initial stabilisation has increased among babies born at <30 weeks GA. 48% of those stabilised with non-invasive ventilation required mechanical ventilation in the first week. A higher quality evidence base for interventions that reduce mechanical ventilation could improve respiratory management in this population.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1136/archdischild-2025-329495

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-03-04T00:00:00+00:00

Keywords

Neonatology, Respiratory Medicine