Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AIMS: Patients with a hip fracture are treated by surgeons at various stages of training, under different levels of supervision. However, it is unclear whether their experience and the level of supervision are associated with patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between operating surgeon experience and level of supervision, and the patients' subsequent quality of life (QoL), mortality, and complications after surgery for a hip fracture. METHODS: A multicentre, prospective cohort study of patients aged 60 years and older with a hip fracture in the UK. Primary exposure was operating surgeon grade and level of supervision. Outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)), mortality, and complications at four months. Linear and Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to assess the relationship between operating surgeon grade and level of supervision, and HRQoL, mortality, and complications. RESULTS: Among 24,523 patients with a hip fracture, there were 12,702 consultant-performed and 11,365 resident-performed operations. Operations performed by supervised residents had better recovery of EQ-5D-5L (mean difference (MD) 0.02, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.03; p < 0.001), a similar risk of mortality (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.01; p = 0.083), but higher risks of reoperation (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.57; p = 0.009), blood transfusion (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.62; p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.04; p < 0.001), lower respiratory tract infection (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.35; p < 0.001), cerebrovascular accident (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.95, p < 0.001), and myocardial infarction (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.74; p < 0.001), compared with operations performed by consultants. Operations performed by unsupervised residents had better recovery of EQ-5D-5L (MD 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.03; p = 0.008), a similar risk of mortality (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.06; p = 0.260), but a higher risk of blood transfusion (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.80; p < 0.001) compared with operations performed by consultants. CONCLUSION: Operations performed by residents were associated with a better recovery of QoL, similar mortality, but slightly more complications compared with consultants. This highlights the need for tailored supervision and structured training to optimize outcomes and ensure patient safety.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1302/2633-1462.76.BJO-2025-0321.R1

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-06-04T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

7

Pages

744 - 752

Total pages

8