Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

INTRODUCTION: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a leading cause of sepsis, which is a life-threatening condition that significantly contributes to the mortality of bacterial infections. Aminoglycoside antibiotics such as gentamicin or amikacin are essential medicines in the treatment of BSIs, but their clinical efficacy is increasingly being compromised by antimicrobial resistance. The aminoglycoside apramycin has demonstrated preclinical efficacy against aminoglycoside-resistant and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) and is currently in clinical development for the treatment of critical systemic infections. METHODS: This study collected a panel of 470 MDR GNB isolates from healthcare facilities in Cambodia, Laos, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam for a multicentre assessment of their antimicrobial susceptibility to apramycin in comparison with other aminoglycosides and colistin by broth microdilution assays. RESULTS: Apramycin and amikacin MICs ≤ 16 µg/mL were found for 462 (98.3%) and 408 (86.8%) GNB isolates, respectively. Susceptibility to gentamicin and tobramycin (MIC ≤ 4 µg/mL) was significantly lower at 122 (26.0%) and 101 (21.5%) susceptible isolates, respectively. Of note, all carbapenem and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales, all Acinetobacter baumannii and all Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates tested in this study appeared to be susceptible to apramycin. Of the 65 colistin-resistant isolates tested, four (6.2%) had an apramycin MIC > 16 µg/mL. CONCLUSION: Apramycin demonstrated best-in-class activity against a panel of GNB isolates with resistances to other aminoglycosides, carbapenems, third-generation cephalosporins and colistin, warranting continued consideration of apramycin as a drug candidate for the treatment of MDR BSIs.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106659

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2022-10-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

60

Keywords

Aminoglycoside, Antimicrobial resistance, Apramycin, Blood culture isolates, Bloodstream infection, Gram negative, Amikacin, Aminoglycosides, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Asia, Southeastern, Blood Culture, Carbapenems, Cephalosporins, Colistin, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Gentamicins, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Nebramycin, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Tobramycin